Speakingof

On April 1st I saw some pretty outlandish products presented for April Fools day. However, there was one that was so successful that the joke was over, this product was recycled copy of something else. This lead me to think further: Is April Fools day the opportunity to present those crazy product ideas to see if it sticks? What if the culture in some companies were to bring you best ideas year round for a potential product and they pick 1 a year that had real world application but no potential? Presenting crazy April Fools day products! One example: In 2014 Google Presented bringing Pokemon to real life, Google's April Fools' prank puts Pokemon in the real world https://www.cnet.com/news/googles-april-fools-prank-puts-pokemon-in-the-real-world/ . Little did we know that in 2016 this would come true. I believe Google received positive feedback and then began to see how possible this could be, though it is April Fools anyways so there was no realistic pressure to make this s

Forever we have been taught and trained to create passwords on computers to allow us access to systems. Normally we make it something we can relate to: names, favorite colors, and birthdays (research if there are statistics of common password types). We have to type in this password often and we quickly need to get access to those systems. Social engineering is the best and easiest way to obtain access to data. 1. Prevents you from using the same password A. Leaves you with no vulnerability to having your other accounts compromised B. The goal is to have a randomized password for all accounts C. Harder to penetrate. a. If it takes more effort for a hacker it’s not worth their time. If you were a big fish they’d rather spear phish you. 1. Relate this methodology to something relatable. Like taking the bus or driving your car to a destination to get their faster to accomplish a task?

• What is the HomePod ◦ To help with definition, may need to define the Amazon Echo • Why is it important ◦ Apple releasing this product puts the needed attention back on Siri ◦ Apple is a hardware company. They can’t sell the HomePod if their competitors handle voice commands better. ‣ List competitors, Amazon Echo, Google Home • Brief Siri background and how it came to be ◦ Apple bought a small company and integrated it’s software into iOS. Not much attention has been placed on it in a very long time. • Where Siri fails when compared to competitors • What does this mean for us? ◦ Siri is embedded into every iPhone, iPad, and Mac computer now ◦ Improving Siri = everyone wins • Conclude ◦ Apple, I want to use Siri to really be my personal assistant. I want it to help me conquer more throughout the day without looking or touching my phone. I believe in you. I have no choice to because you’re (Apple) not selling my data. Love, a tech lover